Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI Models
    • DeepSeek
    • xAI
    • OpenAI
    • Meta AI Llama
    • Google DeepMind
    • Amazon AWS AI
    • Microsoft AI
    • Anthropic (Claude)
    • NVIDIA AI
    • IBM WatsonX Granite 3.1
    • Adobe Sensi
    • Hugging Face
    • Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)
    • Baidu (ERNIE)
    • C3 AI
    • DataRobot
    • Mistral AI
    • Moonshot AI (Kimi)
    • Google Gemma
    • xAI
    • Stability AI
    • H20.ai
  • AI Research
    • Allen Institue for AI
    • arXiv AI
    • Berkeley AI Research
    • CMU AI
    • Google Research
    • Microsoft Research
    • Meta AI Research
    • OpenAI Research
    • Stanford HAI
    • MIT CSAIL
    • Harvard AI
  • AI Funding & Startups
    • AI Funding Database
    • CBInsights AI
    • Crunchbase AI
    • Data Robot Blog
    • TechCrunch AI
    • VentureBeat AI
    • The Information AI
    • Sifted AI
    • WIRED AI
    • Fortune AI
    • PitchBook
    • TechRepublic
    • SiliconANGLE – Big Data
    • MIT News
    • Data Robot Blog
  • Expert Insights & Videos
    • Google DeepMind
    • Lex Fridman
    • Matt Wolfe AI
    • Yannic Kilcher
    • Two Minute Papers
    • AI Explained
    • TheAIEdge
    • Matt Wolfe AI
    • The TechLead
    • Andrew Ng
    • OpenAI
  • Expert Blogs
    • François Chollet
    • Gary Marcus
    • IBM
    • Jack Clark
    • Jeremy Howard
    • Melanie Mitchell
    • Andrew Ng
    • Andrej Karpathy
    • Sebastian Ruder
    • Rachel Thomas
    • IBM
  • AI Policy & Ethics
    • ACLU AI
    • AI Now Institute
    • Center for AI Safety
    • EFF AI
    • European Commission AI
    • Partnership on AI
    • Stanford HAI Policy
    • Mozilla Foundation AI
    • Future of Life Institute
    • Center for AI Safety
    • World Economic Forum AI
  • AI Tools & Product Releases
    • AI Assistants
    • AI for Recruitment
    • AI Search
    • Coding Assistants
    • Customer Service AI
    • Image Generation
    • Video Generation
    • Writing Tools
    • AI for Recruitment
    • Voice/Audio Generation
  • Industry Applications
    • Finance AI
    • Healthcare AI
    • Legal AI
    • Manufacturing AI
    • Media & Entertainment
    • Transportation AI
    • Education AI
    • Retail AI
    • Agriculture AI
    • Energy AI
  • AI Art & Entertainment
    • AI Art News Blog
    • Artvy Blog » AI Art Blog
    • Weird Wonderful AI Art Blog
    • The Chainsaw » AI Art
    • Artvy Blog » AI Art Blog
What's Hot

AI INVESTOR ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Announces that C3.ai, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

Deepseek-R1: AI training costs less than $300,000

Gemini Nano Banana AI: After Saree trend, try these 5 Google-approved prompts to transform your profile picture

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Advanced AI News
  • Home
  • AI Models
    • OpenAI (GPT-4 / GPT-4o)
    • Anthropic (Claude 3)
    • Google DeepMind (Gemini)
    • Meta (LLaMA)
    • Cohere (Command R)
    • Amazon (Titan)
    • IBM (Watsonx)
    • Inflection AI (Pi)
  • AI Research
    • Allen Institue for AI
    • arXiv AI
    • Berkeley AI Research
    • CMU AI
    • Google Research
    • Meta AI Research
    • Microsoft Research
    • OpenAI Research
    • Stanford HAI
    • MIT CSAIL
    • Harvard AI
  • AI Funding
    • AI Funding Database
    • CBInsights AI
    • Crunchbase AI
    • Data Robot Blog
    • TechCrunch AI
    • VentureBeat AI
    • The Information AI
    • Sifted AI
    • WIRED AI
    • Fortune AI
    • PitchBook
    • TechRepublic
    • SiliconANGLE – Big Data
    • MIT News
    • Data Robot Blog
  • AI Experts
    • Google DeepMind
    • Lex Fridman
    • Meta AI Llama
    • Yannic Kilcher
    • Two Minute Papers
    • AI Explained
    • TheAIEdge
    • The TechLead
    • Matt Wolfe AI
    • Andrew Ng
    • OpenAI
    • Expert Blogs
      • François Chollet
      • Gary Marcus
      • IBM
      • Jack Clark
      • Jeremy Howard
      • Melanie Mitchell
      • Andrew Ng
      • Andrej Karpathy
      • Sebastian Ruder
      • Rachel Thomas
      • IBM
  • AI Tools
    • AI Assistants
    • AI for Recruitment
    • AI Search
    • Coding Assistants
    • Customer Service AI
  • AI Policy
    • ACLU AI
    • AI Now Institute
    • Center for AI Safety
  • Business AI
    • Advanced AI News Features
    • Finance AI
    • Healthcare AI
    • Education AI
    • Energy AI
    • Legal AI
LinkedIn Instagram YouTube Threads X (Twitter)
Advanced AI News
IBM

Better Quantum Computing Stock: IonQ vs. IBM

By Advanced AI EditorSeptember 18, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


These companies are racing to achieve breakthroughs in a game-changing technology.

Artificial intelligence has proven to be a transformative technology, yet quantum computing could be bigger. Quantum computers harness the properties of quantum mechanics to perform calculations in a way that’s entirely different from classical computers. Because of this, these machines could, in principle, rapidly solve certain types of extremely complex problems that would take even a traditional supercomputer a prohibitive amount of time.

Two companies working to develop reliable quantum computers for commercial use are IonQ (IONQ 7.04%) and International Business Machines (IBM 1.60%). The former was the first pure-play quantum computing company to go public, with an IPO in 2021. The latter is a tech icon, and back in 2016 became the first company to put a quantum computer in the cloud.

The fundamental unit of every quantum computer is the qubit —  one qubit stores a single point of data. Manipulating that data is how the machines perform calculations. And interestingly, IonQ and IBM are building their qubits using two entirely different technologies. Does that make one or the other a better way to invest in this burgeoning field? Or might other factors prove more important to their paths forward?

The words

Image source: Getty Images.

IonQ’s pros and cons

IonQ uses individual ions (charged atoms) to make its qubits. The approach has advantages over other methods being pursued — and one of the biggest is that it enables the company’s devices to operate at room temperature. By contrast, IBM’s superconducting quantum computers require special cryogenic equipment to keep their qubits at temperatures close to absolute zero. Keeping something that cool uses a lot of energy.

Since its IPO, IonQ’s sales have nearly doubled on an annual basis each year. This shows that clients are finding its offerings compelling. Management predicts that sales trend will continue in 2025: It’s guiding for revenue between $82 million and $100 million for the year, compared to $43.1 million in 2024. Through the first half of 2025, it booked $28.3 million in revenue, up from $19 million in the prior-year period.

IonQ has also been on an acquisition spree as it seeks to quickly expand its technology. Its goal is to lead the construction of a quantum computing-based internet. It even acquired satellite specialist Capella Space to extend its reach into orbit.

But those acquisitions added to IonQ’s operating expenses. Consequently, in Q2, it booked an operating loss of $160.6 million, a substantial increase from its loss of $48.9 million a year earlier. The sustainability of IonQ as a business could be in jeopardy over the long run if its costs continue to skyrocket.

Recognizing this, the company conducted a $1 billion secondary equity offering in July. After that step, it had cash, cash equivalents, and investments of $1.6 billion on its books. This should be enough to sustain the business for a while, but eventually, IonQ will need to get its costs under control.

IBM’s quantum computing progress

IBM’s quantum computers use superconducting qubits, which are a comparatively mature technology, and one that is employed by numerous other businesses working in the field, among them Rigetti Computing and Google parent Alphabet.

One advantage of this method is that superconducting qubits can be fabricated with the same infrastructure used to make traditional semiconductor chips. This compatibility enables mass production capabilities, making the tech more scalable at this point than IonQ’s approach.

IBM brings strong technological chops to the quantum computing field. Its AI and cloud computing offerings are doing well, and its overall second-quarter revenue rose 8% year over year to $17 billion. Its generative AI book of business stood at $7.5 billion at the end of Q2, up from just $2 billion in 2024.

Thanks to this growth, Big Blue expects its 2025 free cash flow (FCF) to exceed $13.5 billion compared to 2024’s $12.7 billion. FCF is an indicator of IBM’s ability to cover its dividends, pay down debt, and invest in its business, including its quantum computing aspirations, so rising FCF is a good sign.

But perhaps the most exciting aspect of investing in IBM is that it’s predicting that its “quantum advantage” will arrive by the end of 2026. Quantum advantage is the point at which a quantum computer can outperform classical computers in solving real-world computational problems, as opposed to the research-related computations they have primarily been tasked with solving so far.

Weighing whether to invest in IonQ or IBM

Quantum advantage will mark the start of the period when quantum computers begin to supplant classical machines for some types of tasks. However, there are technological hurdles for these companies to leap before this transition can happen — among them, reducing the amount of errors quantum computers produce. 

As a result, some forecasts predict that widespread commercial use of quantum computers won’t happen for years, and perhaps not until 2040. That long time frame could be a particular problem for IonQ if it doesn’t get a handle on its operating costs, and makes its stock an even riskier investment. By contrast, IBM, with its consistent FCF, should have little trouble maintaining funding for its quantum tech aspirations.

IBM also offers investors a robust dividend, which sports a forward yield of 2.7% based on the Sept. 12 share price. Big Blue has paid dividends every year since 1916, making its stock a stable source of passive income. IonQ does not pay a dividend.

These factors suggest that IBM is a superior quantum computing investment to IonQ. And if Big Blue can achieve quantum advantage next year, it’s poised to be at the forefront of this exciting field.



Source link

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleIBM, BharatGen partner to accelerate AI adoption in India with Indic Large Language Models
Next Article I tried Nvidia’s AI PC assistant and its mildly useful but not enough to warrant installing it
Advanced AI Editor
  • Website

Related Posts

This Is Why AI Hallucinates, and How IBM Is Tackling the Issue

September 17, 2025

Petrobras launches tenders in Brazil for IBM, Siemens and Huawei technologies

September 17, 2025

Lessons learned, from the CHRO

September 17, 2025

Comments are closed.

Latest Posts

Jackson Pollock Masterpiece Found to Contain Extinct Manganese Blue

Marian Goodman Adds Edith Dekyndt, New Gagosian Director: Industry Moves

How Much to Pay for Emerging Artists’ Work? Art Adviser Says $15,000 Max

Basquiat Biopic ‘Samo Lives’ Filming in East Village

Latest Posts

AI INVESTOR ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Announces that C3.ai, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

September 18, 2025

Deepseek-R1: AI training costs less than $300,000

September 18, 2025

Gemini Nano Banana AI: After Saree trend, try these 5 Google-approved prompts to transform your profile picture

September 18, 2025

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Recent Posts

  • AI INVESTOR ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Announces that C3.ai, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
  • Deepseek-R1: AI training costs less than $300,000
  • Gemini Nano Banana AI: After Saree trend, try these 5 Google-approved prompts to transform your profile picture
  • Intel Spikes 23% on Deal With Nvidia to Develop AI Hardware
  • Early-Stage Trends Report: What every deal in August tells us about what’s next in tech

Recent Comments

  1. CharlesRar on A New Trick Could Block the Misuse of Open Source AI
  2. LhaneUnecy on An improved Large-scale 3D Vision Dataset for Compositional Recognition
  3. OLaneUnecy on OpenAI expects subscription revenue to nearly double to $10bn
  4. podcast on 1-800-CHAT-GPT—12 Days of OpenAI: Day 10
  5. Robertasymn on Chinese Firms Have Placed $16B in Orders for Nvidia’s (NVDA) H20 AI Chips

Welcome to Advanced AI News—your ultimate destination for the latest advancements, insights, and breakthroughs in artificial intelligence.

At Advanced AI News, we are passionate about keeping you informed on the cutting edge of AI technology, from groundbreaking research to emerging startups, expert insights, and real-world applications. Our mission is to deliver high-quality, up-to-date, and insightful content that empowers AI enthusiasts, professionals, and businesses to stay ahead in this fast-evolving field.

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

LinkedIn Instagram YouTube Threads X (Twitter)
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 advancedainews. Designed by advancedainews.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.