According to police records submitted to the city council, the network “only proved useful in a single case.” Investigating the tension between these claims, the Post suggested we may never know how many suspects were misidentified or what steps police took to ensure responsible use of the controversial live feeds.
In the US, New Orleans stands out for taking a step further than law enforcement in other regions by using live feeds from facial recognition cameras to make immediate arrests, the Post noted. The Security Industry Association told the Post that four states—Maryland, Montana, Vermont, and Virginia—and 19 cities nationwide “explicitly bar” the practice.
Lagarde told the Post that police cannot “directly” search for suspects on the camera network or add suspects to the watchlist in real time. Reese Harper, an NOPD spokesperson, told the Post that his department “does not own, rely on, manage, or condone the use by members of the department of any artificial intelligence systems associated with the vast network of Project Nola crime cameras.”
In a federally mandated 2023 audit, New Orleans police complained that complying with the ordinance took too long and “often” resulted in no matches. That could mean the tech is flawed, or it could be a sign that the process was working as intended to prevent wrongful arrests.
The Post noted that in total, “at least eight Americans have been wrongfully arrested due to facial recognition,” as, when both police and AI software rush arrests, mistakes are prone to happen.
“By adopting this system–in secret, without safeguards, and at tremendous threat to our privacy and security–the City of New Orleans has crossed a thick red line,” Wessler said. “This is the stuff of authoritarian surveillance states and has no place in American policing.”
Project Nola did not immediately respond to Ars’ request for comment.