View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking large language models for biomedical natural language processing applications and recommendations, by Qingyu Chen and 20 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The rapid growth of biomedical literature poses challenges for manual knowledge curation and synthesis. Biomedical Natural Language Processing (BioNLP) automates the process. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in general domains, their effectiveness in BioNLP tasks remains unclear due to limited benchmarks and practical guidelines.
We perform a systematic evaluation of four LLMs, GPT and LLaMA representatives on 12 BioNLP benchmarks across six applications. We compare their zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning performance with traditional fine-tuning of BERT or BART models. We examine inconsistencies, missing information, hallucinations, and perform cost analysis. Here we show that traditional fine-tuning outperforms zero or few shot LLMs in most tasks. However, closed-source LLMs like GPT-4 excel in reasoning-related tasks such as medical question answering. Open source LLMs still require fine-tuning to close performance gaps. We find issues like missing information and hallucinations in LLM outputs. These results offer practical insights for applying LLMs in BioNLP.
Submission history
From: Qingyu Chen [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 10 May 2023 13:40:06 UTC (449 KB)
[v2]
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 14:33:54 UTC (672 KB)
[v3]
Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:17:38 UTC (1,091 KB)
[v4]
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 03:11:04 UTC (1,091 KB)
[v5]
Fri, 25 Apr 2025 22:22:45 UTC (1,389 KB)